This is what is expected.
|
Course
blog contribution
|
Purpose
|
·
To
practice thinking & creative writing
·
To
inculcate the habit of actively seeking new knowledge in the area of L &
SCM
·
To
practice giving, taking & using feedback on one’s work
|
Task
|
To write blog
posts on contemporary & interesting aspects of L/SCM in practice
|
Response
|
To read other
posts, reflect & enhance understanding by providing feedback through
comments
|
Outcome
|
·
Better
writing & thinking
·
Increased
awareness of developments in the area of LSCM
·
More
open to giving & taking constructive feedback
|
Check the rubric here
RUBRIC FOR BLOGGING: Contributing to course blog
carries 20% weight of your total 100 marks in the course. Your posts in the
course blog will be assessed based on the dimensions in the given rubric and
your work will be placed in one of the four given levels and the marks bucket
(out of 20 marks).
Dimensions of quality
|
Below satisfaction
(<8)
|
Satisfactory
(9
– 12%)
|
Above Satisfaction
(13 – 17)
|
Excellent
(18-20)
|
Originality
|
Posts
do not reflect the author’s personality and word choice does not bring the
topic to life. Copy and paste; no attempt to be original
|
Posts
reflect almost no personality and little attempt is made to use effective
word choices to bring the topic to life.
|
Posts
reflect a bit of the author’s personality through word choices that attempt
to bring the topic to life.
|
Posts
reflect the author’s unique personality through choice does not bring the
topic to life.
|
Content & Creativity
|
Posts show no evidence of insight,
understanding or reflective thought about the topic
Posts show no specific viewpoint and
no supporting examples or links to websites or documents are provided, or the
links selected are of poor quality and do not add any value to the
information presented
Posts
do not stimulate dialogue and commentary and do not connect with the
audience.
|
Provide minimal insight,
understanding and reflective thought about the topic.
Posts present a specific viewpoint
but lack supporting examples or links to websites or documents, but not all
links enhance the information presented.
Posts
are brief and unimaginative, and reflect minimal effort to connect with the
audience.
|
Posts provide moderate
insight, understanding and reflective thought about the topic
Posts present a specific viewpoint
that is substantiated by supporting examples and links to websites or
documents, but not all links enhance the information presented.
Posts
are generally well written with some attempts made to stimulate dialogue and
commentary.
|
Posts provide comprehensive insight,
understanding, and reflective thought about the topic by -building a focused
argument around a specific issue or -asking a new related question or -making
an oppositional statement supported by personal experience or related
research.
Posts present a focused and cohesive
viewpoint that is substantiated by effective supporting examples or links to
relevant, up-to-date websites or documents that enhance the information
presented.
Posts
are creatively and fluently written to stimulate dialogue and commentary
|
Quality of Writing
|
Posts contain numerous grammatical,
spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing does not facilitate
effective communication.
|
Posts include some grammatical,
spelling or punctuation errors that distract the reader.
|
Posts are largely free of
grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing generally
facilitates communication.
|
Posts are free of grammatical,
spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing facilitates
communication.
|
Timeliness & Regularity
|
Does not update blog within the
required time frame.
|
Updates blog when reminded; posts
are often missing a date stamp.
|
Updates blog when required; most
posts are date-stamped with the most current posting listed at the top.
|
Updates blog as often or more often
than required; all posts are date stamped and the most recent posts are
placed at the top of the page.
|